1
00:02:15,770 --> 00:02:17,730
to get those messages out.

2
00:02:24,910 --> 00:02:28,920
Even the wealthiest company canâ€™t spend
enough money to have as much influence as

3
00:02:28,920 --> 00:02:33,060
the New York Times, with its massive readership,
does every day.

4
00:02:22,830 --> 00:02:24,910
need to be allowed to speak.

5
00:02:17,730 --> 00:02:22,830
If you care about free and fair elections,
then all the voices that an election can affect

6
00:02:11,750 --> 00:02:15,770
that can affect the world around them, when
there arenâ€™t enough others willing or able

7
00:02:07,079 --> 00:02:11,750
But what advertising can do is make sure the
voters are exposed to all the ideas and issues

8
00:02:02,479 --> 00:02:07,079
Individual citizens must engage their own
minds and use their own voting power.

9
00:01:58,430 --> 00:02:02,479
Pure advertising canâ€™t get a politician
elected or a law passed.

10
00:01:56,549 --> 00:01:58,430
familiar with knows that.

11
00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:56,549
Anyone who has had the experience of seeing
a news report about a topic theyâ€™re highly

12
00:01:49,750 --> 00:01:53,000
But journalists are journalists, not industry
experts.

13
00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:49,740
And journalists can be helpful in bringing that to
light, no doubt.

14
00:01:45,020 --> 00:01:46,560
"Senator, we run ads."

15
00:01:37,960 --> 00:01:45,020
"Well if so how do you sustain a business
model in which users don't pay for your service?"

16
00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:37,960
But also keep in mind that politicians arenâ€™t
always the brightest.

17
00:01:33,860 --> 00:01:34,920
Absolutely.

18
00:01:32,670 --> 00:01:33,860
will benefit them?

19
00:01:28,860 --> 00:01:32,670
Is it the case that businesses want to help
elect candidates and pass legislation that

20
00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:28,860
See Amazonâ€™s Jeff Bezos, owner of the Washington
Post.

21
00:01:22,700 --> 00:01:24,920
wealthy enough to buy their own media outfits.

22
00:01:18,360 --> 00:01:22,700
The problem is that others canâ€™t do the
sameâ€¦ except business leaders massively

23
00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:15,220
no problem with that.

24
00:01:15,220 --> 00:01:18,360
Theyâ€™re entitled to their opinion and to
preach it far and wide.

25
00:01:10,380 --> 00:01:14,360
And except when they publish biased coverage
while proclaiming itâ€™s unbiased, thereâ€™s

26
00:01:04,909 --> 00:01:10,380
Beyond favorable campaign coverage and glowing
op-eds, newspapers even outright endorse candidates!

27
00:01:00,380 --> 00:01:04,900
From the left or the right, media bias factors
into almost all reporting we consume.

28
00:00:55,200 --> 00:01:00,380
But journalism is rarely if ever unbiased.

29
00:00:51,980 --> 00:00:55,199
Journalism helps keep politicians accountable
to the people.

30
00:00:49,150 --> 00:00:51,980
the pressâ€™s speech is fundamental to a free
society.

31
00:00:40,690 --> 00:00:44,579
Less controversially protected under the first
amendment is the freedom of the press, whose

32
00:00:44,579 --> 00:00:49,150
free speech is doubly protected by an extra
clause. Let me be clear, I think protecting

33
00:00:38,340 --> 00:00:40,680
Corporations in the news business!

34
00:00:36,280 --> 00:00:38,340
speech, and they already do.

35
00:00:31,820 --> 00:00:36,280
type of corporation that could spend as much money
as they can raise and desire on political

36
00:00:28,119 --> 00:00:31,820
Even if the Citizens United decision were
to be overturned, there would still be a certain

37
00:00:25,039 --> 00:00:28,119
But let me inform you of something you may
not have considered.

38
00:00:13,679 --> 00:00:16,170
Only 9% strongly supported the decision.

39
00:00:20,720 --> 00:00:21,939
and spend.â€

40
00:00:21,939 --> 00:00:25,039
Playing those odds, if youâ€™re watching this
video, youâ€™re in that majority.

41
00:00:16,170 --> 00:00:20,720
57% would like to actively â€œplace limits
on the amount of money Super PACs can raise

42
00:00:10,150 --> 00:00:13,679
of campaign cash from corporations, non-profits,
and people.â€

43
00:00:05,060 --> 00:00:10,150
in Citizens United v. FEC, which allows â€œso-called
Super PACs to raise and spend unlimited amounts

44
00:00:00,220 --> 00:00:05,060
According to an Ipsos poll, a plurality of
Americans oppose the Supreme Courtâ€™s decision

45
00:02:33,060 --> 00:02:33,900
Iâ€™m Jake Klein.

46
00:02:33,900 --> 00:02:37,400
If you liked this video, please help us share
it and subscribe to our channel.

47
00:02:37,400 --> 00:02:38,560
Thanks for watching!

